|
DC Universe [all categories]
![]() DC Universe Archives
![]() Secret Origins Archives
|
| next newest topic | next oldest topic |
| Author | Topic: Secret Origins Archives |
|
Dr. Van Thorp Member |
Lets face it: some golden age characters are never going to get published in archive format. Nontheless, many readers would consider the original origins of these characters to be a worthwhile purchase. I propose that DC publish an Archives book of a new type. The book would be a hardbound, high-quality reprint of the origin stories of second-stringers. These origins would be collected from the various magazines, and assembled into one thick book. I am not proposing a compilation of the 1980's series, which contained new material based on old material. The Archive book would contain the ACTUAL old material. IP: Logged |
|
Michael Bise Member |
I'd like this, but also would like to see the Seventies Nick Cardy covers for SECRET ORIGINS Archived along with these. ------------------ Michael IP: Logged |
|
Old Dude Member |
Those '70s Secret Origins issues are solid gold! I still get them out once in a while and give 'em a hug. I was SO upset when they cancelled it due to a paper shortage, of all things. IP: Logged |
|
friend Member |
That's a very interesting idea about having archives about origins of Superheroes (golden). I only have two points against it. a)How do we know that a particular characters in this theoric archive will never have his own - FOR SURE??? b)Frustration - when we read that archive and stumble upon a great hero that'll be new to us - we'll know that in theory it's only a one shot... But, above that, I'm all for it. Compilations are great. I bought the hardcover greatest golden age stories and it's one of my fave books! Friend. ------------------ IP: Logged |
|
NecessaryImpurity Member |
Such a book shouldn't be limited to just obscure characters. With most Golden Age stories running no more than 13 pages, it's easy enough to toss in a handful of high profile characters to help make the book more saleable. The added cost is negligible,since Batman, Flash, Green Lantern, Wonder Woman, Superman, and Plastic Man all have had their original origins Archived already. If a Secret Origins book needs some of these stories to make the project fly, I say add them in. If it bumbs the size of the project to 2 or 3 volumes, I don't have a problem with that either. IP: Logged |
|
friend Member |
If in such a volume they would reprint Flash, Superman, Wonder, bats, ect... That would sink it for me. In fact, I hesited to buy regular Superman archives simply because I own Superman 1 and Action Comics 1 too many times... ------------------ IP: Logged |
|
vze2 Member |
I'm all for a Secret Origins book, but their MIGHT be a problem. I know Roy Thomas had to create an origin for at least one character. I'm not sure how many of them actually have origin stories before the 80s. I really don't want to see them mixing things up. If they need a substantial number of the modern stories, then I'd say make it a collection of the modern stories. Perhaps a collection with both versions might work. When the original character doesn't have an origin, reprint the first appearance. I think most of Roy Thomas's origin stories include material from the first appearances anyway, so it would still enable you to make a comparison. IP: Logged |
|
Not My Real Name Member |
quote: You could probably have two volumes of origin stories just for Batman and Superman alone. I think it would be interesting to read how each of their origins have been depicted and expanded through the years. ------------------ IP: Logged |
|
friend Member |
You have a good point and it makes me ponder on another question: how far stretched can an origin be? For example would the story of the bat-suit that Thomas wore on haloween be part of batsie's origin? Would "the earthman who went to Krypton" be part of Superman's origin? Ect and many ects... The more I think of it - if they strectch the archive too thin, it might tear... ------------------ IP: Logged |
|
James Friel Member |
And what about Mopee....? IP: Logged |
|
Not My Real Name Member |
quote: Don't know about the Superman story, but I'd say, yes, "The First Batman" should be included because in this story Batman discovers that the killing of his parents wasn't some random hold up, but a case of murder-for-hire. What I think is interesting is seeing how the details evolve and change as the times change. In the 1940 origin from [B]Batman #1[B/] both parents are shot, but in the 1948 origin published in [B]Batman #47[B/] only Thomas is shot but "that single bullet really killed two people, for Martha Wayne's weak heart stopped from the sudden shock." Much later, in [B]The Dark Knight Returns[B/] there is a close up of the gun barrel pressed against Mrs. Wayne's neck. In the 1948 origin Bruce Wayne was merely walking with his parents. At what point was it revealed that family was returning from a showing of [I]The Mark of Zorro[I/]? Originally a bat flies into an open window to inspire Bruce. At what point did the bust of Thomas Wayne enter the picture? What I'm starting to envision is a book that tells not just the origin of Batman, but the origins of some of the details that we've taken for granted as being part of the mythos: the pearl necklace, Joe Chill, the training, the bat, "Criminals are a superstitious, cowardly lot" etc. Anybody game? ------------------ IP: Logged |
All times are ET (US) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
![]() |
|
Copyright © 2003 DC Comics
Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
DC COMICS PRIVACY INFORMATION
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47